Lower House Prices and Separating Couples:

Why a Falling Property Market Might ACTUALLY Be Good News

If you are separating, discovering that your home is worth less may feel like bad news. In family-law property settlements, however, a falling market can sometimes make the practical steps of dividing property or refinancing the home and buying somewhere new more achievable than they first appear.

For couples trying to untangle their financial lives, the headline value of the house is only one part of the story. What often matters more is whether the numbers allow each person to move forward with a workable roof over their head.

Understanding the property pool

A family-law property settlement generally involves identifying the couple’s property pool. This may include the family home, savings, investments, vehicles, businesses, superannuation and debts.

Assets are generally considered at their current value when the settlement is resolved. These present-day dollar amounts may be described as their nominal values.

The focus is therefore on what the house is worth now, not what it was worth at the market’s peak or what it might be worth in the future.

High prices can make keeping the house difficult

A strong property market can look reassuring on paper. For separating couples, however, high values can create a surprisingly difficult practical problem: the more equity there is in the home, the larger the payout may be if one of you wants to keep it.

That person may have to refinance the existing mortgage and borrow enough to pay the other person out. If the what needs to be borrowed is beyond what the bank will approve, the emotional preference to keep the home may collide with a hard lending limit. The result can be a forced sale, or a settlement that leans more heavily on superannuation or other assets to balance the equation.

That may be fair in nominal terms, but it is not always equally useful in real life. Superannuation can be valuable, but it cannot be handed to a real estate agent as a deposit on a new home.

Both people may be better placed to move forward

This is where a softer property market can change the conversation. A lower valuation may reduce the amount one that has to borrowed to keep the home. At the same time, the person leaving the home may be looking for a replacement property in the same cooler market.

In that sense, falling prices do not simply shrink the asset pool. They can also create room for a more practical settlement, particularly where both people need to re-establish themselves financially.

Instead of the family home being sold because the payout is too high, there may be a pathway for one of you to refinance and the other to receive enough accessible cash to begin again.

How the refinancing numbers can change

A closer look at the numbers

Consider a home worth $1.2 million with a $400,000 mortgage. There is $800,000 in equity, so a simplified equal division may require a $400,000 payout. To keep the property, the retaining person may need to refinance to $800,000: the existing $400,000 mortgage plus the $400,000 payment to the other person.

·       Home value: $1.2 million

·       Mortgage: $400,000

·       Equity: $800,000

·       Total payout: $400,000

·       Total refinance needed: $800,000

When you can’t borrow enough

If the bank will not lend that much, the couple may look for alternatives. One option might be a mixed settlement, with the departing person receiving $300,000 in cash and $100,000 in additional superannuation. The total value of the settlement may still be $400,000, but only $300,000 is immediately available for a deposit, stamp duty, moving costs and the practical business of buying again.

·       Home value: $1.2 million

·       Mortgage: $400,000

·       Equity: $800,000

·       Indicative payout: $300,000

·       Additional superannuation adjustment: $100,000

·       Total payout: $400,000

·       Total refinance needed: $700,000

·    Practical issue: only $300,000 is immediately available for housing costs.

When the lower value improves the outcome

Now imagine the same home falls to $1 million while the mortgage remains $400,000. The equity is $600,000 and the indicative payout is $300,000. The person keeping the home may need total borrowings of $700,000, rather than $800,000.

·       Lower home value: $1 million

·       Mortgage: $400,000

·       Equity: $600,000

·       Total payout: $300,000

·       Total refinance needed: $700,000

In that version of the story, the retaining person may be able to refinance and make the payout entirely in cash. The departing person receives $300,000 they can actually use, and they may be buying into a market where comparable properties have also become cheaper.

The result is not that anyone is wealthier in an absolute sense. Rather, the settlement may become more functional: one person can stay, the other can leave with accessible funds, and both have a better chance of rebuilding without a forced sale.

Of course, every settlement depends on the whole property pool, the parties’ contributions, their future needs and the terms ultimately agreed or ordered. The examples above are deliberately simplified, but they show why the headline value of the home should not be mistaken for the practical outcome. It also does not mean falling prices automatically make a settlement easy. Banks will still assess income, expenses, dependants, debts and serviceability. But if a person’s borrowing capacity remains broadly similar while the payout required falls, the same borrowing limit can stretch further.

The practical point

The important point is not that a lower valuation is always good news or in fact bad news. It is that a lower valuation can change what is possible. At the top of the market, a payout may be technically fair but practically unaffordable. In a softer market, the same couple may find that the numbers finally allow a settlement that works in real life.

For separating couples, that can be unexpectedly important. The goal is not simply to divide the asset pool on paper, but to reach an outcome that

lets both people make realistic decisions about housing, borrowing and the next stage of their lives.

In a falling market, the numbers may feel disappointing at first glance. But for some separating couples, lower house prices may open the door to a more practical, more balanced and more liveable settlement.

Book a free call

This article provides general information only and is not legal, financial or credit advice. Separating couples should obtain advice about their own circumstances before making decisions about property settlement, refinancing or purchasing another home.